WANG Xiao-yu;ZHU Yun;SHEN Wu-ling;PING Ling;CAI Wei;SUN Ming-bo;Institute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medicine Science & Peking Union Medical College, Yunnan Key Laboratory of Vaccine Research & Development on Severe Infectious Diseases;Objective To compare the effectiveness of two kinds of gel filtration medium in purification of polio virus Sabin strain. Methods Three batches of harvested liquids of polio virus Sabin strain of types Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ were concentrated by ultrafilitration, and purified by Sepharose CL-6B sepharose 6FF gel filtration chromatography separately.The purification peaks were collected and determined for D antigen and protein contents to calculate the specific activity,protein removal rate and antigen recovery rate, based on which the collection range of virus peaks was confirmed. The harvested virus liquid with the highest antigen content was purified by DEAE Sepharose FF ion exchange chromatography,and determined for residual Vero cell DNA, residual Vero cell protein, residual bovine serum albumin and residual antibiotics contents. Results In Sepharose 6FF gel filtration chromatography, samples were loaded at 6% of column volume, while the mean recovery rates of virus of types Ⅰ, Ⅱand Ⅲ were 78. 69%, 78. 03% and 78. 37% respectively.However, in Sepharose CL-6B chromatography, the samples were loaded at 3% of the column volume, and the mean recovery rates were 77. 29%, 78. 60% and 77. 36% respectively, which showed no significant difference with those by Sepharose 6FF chromatography(P > 0. 05). After further purification by ion exchange chromatography, the protein removal rate, specific activity, residual Vero cell DNA content, residual Vero cell protein content, residual bovine serum albumin content and residual antibiotics content of harvest liquids of various types met the requirements in Chinese Pharmacopoeia(Volume Ⅲ, 2015 edition), which showed no significant difference in those previously purified by Sepharose 6FF and Sepharo se CL-6B chromatography. Conclusion The recovery rate and specific activity of virus antigen of various types purified by Sepharose 6FF chromatography showed no significant difference with those by Sepharose CL-6B chromatography. However, the times of sample loading decreased, and the purification efficacy increased remarkably, indicating that Sepharose CL-6B might be substituted with Sepharose 6FF.
2017 10 v.30 [Abstract][OnlineView][Download 401K]